Hi, There is no limitation to generate the multi part MT950, but there is no high level API for it. You have to control length restriction in your message construction code. Regards, Sebastian

is there support to generate a multi part mt950 subject to per mt950 message length restriction? If so, are there any references to use that facility?

Hi Rashmi, That field and several others are already implemented at the CVS version. You can check it out and compile the jar file or wait for the next RC release that will be out soon. Regards,

hi there, We are using Field95S in some Swift message but the latest version of Wife does not provide full implementation of this class. when trying to parse Field95S value into field components,

Yes, swift-parser-text jar is reallye old (years ago).

ok i try to use the 5.2 version and it works. Sorry for the useless thread :s

Hi, i want to install a dependency to wife in my pom.xml. I added the following tags: [code]<dependency> <groupId>net.sourceforge.wife</groupId> <artifactId>s

Hello Summer, Since version 5 (Jun 21, 2007) the model supports unparsed text contents. In you sample your MT569 is attached to the first system message. So you have to call the parser again with t

Hello Nicky, Your appreciation is correct. If the message you are processing has been received from network you can assume it is well formed. Said that, if you look for fields 56a, the first occ

Hello, Please notice that WIFE's core model is generic and does not know about message structure (sequences, subsequences), so: 1) You have to create the opening and closing fields with its proper